This may make damage our marketing share. I wonder whether it is worthwhile to change our default font to "better" look fonts even though we break some web site compatibility.Īt least in Japan, most users commenting in forums, twitter, etc comment only negative fact. > This change seems to become breaking web page because character width/height > lot of feedback of both positive and negative. (In reply to Makoto Kato (:m_kato) from comment #7) This seems that not all users of IE 11 may be reading web sites with MS PGothic. I'm still not sure why my IE hate Miryo, though. However, after restarting my computer (because IE said it's necessary), then, the default font setting is restored to "MS PGothic". When I reset IE's settings, I see IE renders my site with Meiryo. I realized that my IE 11's default font setting is still "MS PGothic".
On the other hand, I realized odd behavior of IE 11 (on Win 8.1). Hmm, current Google Chrome use Meiryo in default settings. > My web pages don't specify font-family property, then, both IE11 and Chromium (.0) still use MS PGothic. It's available as a free download for Windows Vista and Server 2008, but not XP. It would improve the out of the box experience if the old jagged fonts weren't used by default when the better ones are available.Īlso, apparently when Firefox is downloaded from /, it actually installs Microsoft YaHei in order to use it as the default. They're also available as free downloads for Windows XP. Details Windows Vista introduced CJK ClearType fonts that look nice and smooth. Before and after comparisons - Wikipedia main page
0 kommentar(er)
